The "realignment of Hood Canal Drive" currently occurring in Shorewood involves raising a big culvert and the road over it. Announced in December 2006, the work is being done 18 months later. It will serve a portion of Hansville's 2093 people. Budgeted at $625,000, the actual cost is now $1.5 million.
Meanwhile, half of Seabeck's population of 5,000 people have been stranded one to three days per year for 151 years when a heavily trafficked bridge is flooded. If Seabeckers need to go to a job, buy groceries, or need an ambulance, they have to drive a ten mile detour, which may be open if it hasn't suffered another landslide (at least one per year). The county finally admitted Seabeck had a problem in 2004 and scheduled bridge-and-culvert raising for 2007. It's 2008 and it still hasn't happened.
So we have to ask: How did a small population in Hansville get $1.5 million for road work they didn't HAVE to have, and get it so fast, while much larger Seabeck hasn't gotten the same road repair for 151 years? Could it be that the founder of GHAAC became the lead Commissioner of Kitsap County?
Friday, August 8, 2008
Thursday, August 7, 2008
The Bumps Weren't an End, They Were the Beginning
The Hansville Log reports that a Cross-Connector Road Feasibility Study Committee is being formed under Gerry Porter (638-1150). Such a road is attractive to bumpside people to divert traffic away from their houses, and it appeals to commuters weary of the bumps.
Old-time residents say that the county spent over a million dollars on a feasibility study in the '90s. The upshot was that it would devastate the last wild animal habitat in the north of the peninsula, it would create major water runoff problems, and it would cost a phenomenal amount---and the newspaper says the cost of asphalt will quadruple this year.
Based on the petitions for and against the bumps, 88% of Hansville wants the bumps removed and our arterial roads returned to arterial speed limits. That wouild solve the commute problems for 88% of Hansville, and it would cost very little compared to building a whole new road.
My neighbor was recently coming home on Twin Spits by the grocery and came up on a couple walking along their road. The car couldn't cross into the oncoming lane, so the car proceeded forward at a crawl. The lady sidestepped onto the wide shoulder there but the man insisted on walking in the road. As he walked past the barely-moving car, he smacked it repeatedly with a Steve Bauer election sign on a stick.
Notice a pattern here? The whiners on Twin Spits and Cliffside so screwed up our ride in and out of Hansville, and have so discouraged our hopes of majority rule returning the roads to us as they once were, that we're crazy enough to consider building a new road that avoids the bumps, leaves the whiners' roads empty for themselves only, and they do it all on the taxpayers' millions.
Old-time residents say that the county spent over a million dollars on a feasibility study in the '90s. The upshot was that it would devastate the last wild animal habitat in the north of the peninsula, it would create major water runoff problems, and it would cost a phenomenal amount---and the newspaper says the cost of asphalt will quadruple this year.
Based on the petitions for and against the bumps, 88% of Hansville wants the bumps removed and our arterial roads returned to arterial speed limits. That wouild solve the commute problems for 88% of Hansville, and it would cost very little compared to building a whole new road.
My neighbor was recently coming home on Twin Spits by the grocery and came up on a couple walking along their road. The car couldn't cross into the oncoming lane, so the car proceeded forward at a crawl. The lady sidestepped onto the wide shoulder there but the man insisted on walking in the road. As he walked past the barely-moving car, he smacked it repeatedly with a Steve Bauer election sign on a stick.
Notice a pattern here? The whiners on Twin Spits and Cliffside so screwed up our ride in and out of Hansville, and have so discouraged our hopes of majority rule returning the roads to us as they once were, that we're crazy enough to consider building a new road that avoids the bumps, leaves the whiners' roads empty for themselves only, and they do it all on the taxpayers' millions.
Hey Steve - Whose Laptop Was That ???
You would think a simple question posed to your local Commissioner would receive a simple and straightforward response. But not in Hansville - not when it is a question to Steve Bauer about the speed bump propaganda circus that he has been promoting for the last 8 months.
At the big April 23 meeting in Hansville, Bauer was sitting by the laptop computer being used by the pro-bump group to make their sales pitch, with Powerpoint slides, colorful charts, etc. When it had a "system hang" and had to be re-booted, Bauer himself jumped up and handled that task. And the user names that then showed up on the Welcome screen included "Steve" and "Ann."
Was this Bauer's own computer and projector, being used to host and promote the pro-bump sales pitch, at the very same time that Bauer was promoting himself as the "Healer of Hansville", who was not choosing sides and not "picking a winner and loser"?
I've emailed Bauer many times asking for an answer - because I think people would want to know this when evaluating his candor and credibility - but he has never responded. I discussed it with his lieutenant, Ann Blair, a couple of months ago, and nothing ever came of that, either. Why would Bauer be ashamed or afraid to answer the question honestly?
If anyone knows the answer to this, please post a comment and tell us the facts. Prize for the first correct answer is a Sandra LaCelle yard sign , or a bottle of wine - winner's choice!
Monday, July 28, 2008
Speed Bumps: Steve Bauer + 630 Signatures + Six Months = No Change
August 25 will mark six months to the day from the County Board of Commissioners meeting at which Steve Bauer and Jan Angel were presented with over 600 signatures on a petition demanding that the speed bumps be removed. (Josh Brown was busy with something more important that evening and thus was not present).
What has Commissioner Bauer done in response? Well, as one who has been involved in the front lines of the fight, I can say that he has exhibited very little willingness to talk straight with people who are against the bumps, and has repeatedly failed to respond to straightforward inquiries regarding his role in the process that got the bumps installed, his bias in favor of the bumps, and his scheme for trying to defuse the issue and make the problem go away.
But - Bauer has at least made it clear that he does not care what the majority of Hansville citizens think about the bumps. He has ignored emails asking whether he will respect a majority vote of the affected residents/owners as to whether the bumps should stay or go. In fact, at an April 23 meeting, he very clearly stated that he was not going to remove the bumps simply because a huge majority of people wanted them gone.
So, Bauer has reverted to a proven technique that government and public agencies rely on all the time: death by meeting. Bauer and his lieutenant, County employee Ann Blair, have rolled out a plan for endless meetings, with no clear outcomes, and with no commitment by Bauer or the Commissioners to do anything when the meetings are all over. Bauer's game plan is the famous "Four Ds" of using procedure to kill something off - an endless series of meetings and "process" designed to "delay, defuse, discourage, and defeat." For a guy who took the position - publicly - that the bumps needed broad community support before they were put in, he has certainly changed his tune. Now, he accepts them as valid, and has placed the burden on those opposed to the bumps - the majority - to somehow "satisfy" the pro-bumpers' needs (as defined by the pro-bumpers) before Bauer will even consider doing anything at all.
The series of meetings that Bauer set up to try to fend off the speed bump critics has been a sorry exhibition of much that is wrong with today's trends du jour in management theory and organizational development. First, nobody will actually be responsible for making a decision and taking the heat for it. Instead, somehow, the people of Hansville - if they just go to enough meetings and talk enough about validating each other's core principles and personal needs, etc., etc. - will end up agreeing on everything. That way, the non-decision maker (Bauer) simply stands aside, lets everyone have a lovefest, and in the end pats himself on the back for guiding everyone along such a successful path to personal fulfillment and harmony. After all, as Bauer has stated publicly, he does not want to choose a winner and loser. Well, OK, but I thought that was a core function of any governmental official, especially an elected one: making the decision between two opposing views, and letting the chips fall where they may.
Instead, Bauer wants the two opposing camps to simply continue to bludgeon each other until one side or the other calls it quits. That is not a recipe for happiness in Hansville. Bauer and the pro-bumpers have already been surprised by the scope, intensity, and depth of the opposition to their bumps, and by now they would presumably understand that the speed bump opponents will not be going quietly into that dark night.
And, more to the point, Bauer is picking a winner: the speed bumps. Every day that he keeps them in place, while endless meetings with no defined outcome take place, he is picking a winner. Rather than treat the bumps as the unwarranted and unsupported deviation that they are, recognizing the mistake made in putting them in, and then promptly taking them out - thus returning everyone to the pre-mistake setting - Bauer is treating them as though they belong there. For Bauer to claim that he is not picking a winner is simply disingenuous.
Second, some of the meetings have been so condescending to Hansville's citizens that it makes you wonder what the County people were thinking, or if they were thinking at all. Therese Reilly wrote an excellent review of the big April 23 meeting, at which we were treated to a Sheriff who was there to compare the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to the death and destruction that would occur in Hansville if the bumps weren't there - oh, and who also mentioned that a few of his deputies were there to "keep the peace" because of concerns about tempers getting out of hand at the meeting. Puh-leez, Sheriff. And, there was Kreskin the Fire Chief, who somehow tested things without testing them . . . .
The last big meeting on June --- was a doozy. Adult citizens of Hansville were subjected to a lecture from a rather agitated Ann Blair about how things were going to be done - and then proceeded to put little sticky dots on some paper on the wall. If this sounds like 3rd grade to you - well, that's about what it felt like in the crowd. Another highlight was her explanation that when someone votes for a solution, they won't know what they are voting for because a smaller group will later decide what the proposal meant, and craft something that they think is appropriate.
So, there will be more meetings, more committees, more emails about working as a team and listening to our hearts so that we can move forward with a cohesive mission that validates all of our core values and achieves a new paradigm of community love, and - critically - more time spent by people to whom time is precious, doing work that will very likely be ingnominiously flushed down the nearest receptacle by Steve Bauer.
Because I think Bauer already knows what the outcome of all this tail-chasing is. He just isn't telling you and me.
What has Commissioner Bauer done in response? Well, as one who has been involved in the front lines of the fight, I can say that he has exhibited very little willingness to talk straight with people who are against the bumps, and has repeatedly failed to respond to straightforward inquiries regarding his role in the process that got the bumps installed, his bias in favor of the bumps, and his scheme for trying to defuse the issue and make the problem go away.
But - Bauer has at least made it clear that he does not care what the majority of Hansville citizens think about the bumps. He has ignored emails asking whether he will respect a majority vote of the affected residents/owners as to whether the bumps should stay or go. In fact, at an April 23 meeting, he very clearly stated that he was not going to remove the bumps simply because a huge majority of people wanted them gone.
So, Bauer has reverted to a proven technique that government and public agencies rely on all the time: death by meeting. Bauer and his lieutenant, County employee Ann Blair, have rolled out a plan for endless meetings, with no clear outcomes, and with no commitment by Bauer or the Commissioners to do anything when the meetings are all over. Bauer's game plan is the famous "Four Ds" of using procedure to kill something off - an endless series of meetings and "process" designed to "delay, defuse, discourage, and defeat." For a guy who took the position - publicly - that the bumps needed broad community support before they were put in, he has certainly changed his tune. Now, he accepts them as valid, and has placed the burden on those opposed to the bumps - the majority - to somehow "satisfy" the pro-bumpers' needs (as defined by the pro-bumpers) before Bauer will even consider doing anything at all.
The series of meetings that Bauer set up to try to fend off the speed bump critics has been a sorry exhibition of much that is wrong with today's trends du jour in management theory and organizational development. First, nobody will actually be responsible for making a decision and taking the heat for it. Instead, somehow, the people of Hansville - if they just go to enough meetings and talk enough about validating each other's core principles and personal needs, etc., etc. - will end up agreeing on everything. That way, the non-decision maker (Bauer) simply stands aside, lets everyone have a lovefest, and in the end pats himself on the back for guiding everyone along such a successful path to personal fulfillment and harmony. After all, as Bauer has stated publicly, he does not want to choose a winner and loser. Well, OK, but I thought that was a core function of any governmental official, especially an elected one: making the decision between two opposing views, and letting the chips fall where they may.
Instead, Bauer wants the two opposing camps to simply continue to bludgeon each other until one side or the other calls it quits. That is not a recipe for happiness in Hansville. Bauer and the pro-bumpers have already been surprised by the scope, intensity, and depth of the opposition to their bumps, and by now they would presumably understand that the speed bump opponents will not be going quietly into that dark night.
And, more to the point, Bauer is picking a winner: the speed bumps. Every day that he keeps them in place, while endless meetings with no defined outcome take place, he is picking a winner. Rather than treat the bumps as the unwarranted and unsupported deviation that they are, recognizing the mistake made in putting them in, and then promptly taking them out - thus returning everyone to the pre-mistake setting - Bauer is treating them as though they belong there. For Bauer to claim that he is not picking a winner is simply disingenuous.
Second, some of the meetings have been so condescending to Hansville's citizens that it makes you wonder what the County people were thinking, or if they were thinking at all. Therese Reilly wrote an excellent review of the big April 23 meeting, at which we were treated to a Sheriff who was there to compare the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to the death and destruction that would occur in Hansville if the bumps weren't there - oh, and who also mentioned that a few of his deputies were there to "keep the peace" because of concerns about tempers getting out of hand at the meeting. Puh-leez, Sheriff. And, there was Kreskin the Fire Chief, who somehow tested things without testing them . . . .
The last big meeting on June --- was a doozy. Adult citizens of Hansville were subjected to a lecture from a rather agitated Ann Blair about how things were going to be done - and then proceeded to put little sticky dots on some paper on the wall. If this sounds like 3rd grade to you - well, that's about what it felt like in the crowd. Another highlight was her explanation that when someone votes for a solution, they won't know what they are voting for because a smaller group will later decide what the proposal meant, and craft something that they think is appropriate.
So, there will be more meetings, more committees, more emails about working as a team and listening to our hearts so that we can move forward with a cohesive mission that validates all of our core values and achieves a new paradigm of community love, and - critically - more time spent by people to whom time is precious, doing work that will very likely be ingnominiously flushed down the nearest receptacle by Steve Bauer.
Because I think Bauer already knows what the outcome of all this tail-chasing is. He just isn't telling you and me.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Hansville Redneck? Or Lawn Mower Assailant?
Well, maybe both! This must be the kind of guy that those GHAAC members are concerned about. If we could only dress him up in some nice Ralph Lauren togs, give him a haircut, Blackberry, and a BMW - and perhaps a bath - then he would be just the kind of "professional" that GHAAC says it wants to attract to Hansville! Maybe he could even be appointed as a County Commissioner some day . . .
OK, OK - he's not really from Hansville, and maybe that's a good thing. Otherwise, GHAAC would need to form a Firearms Safety and Lawn Equipment Protection Committee, known as the FSLEPC, to take aggressive action to keep Hansville safe.
Monday, July 21, 2008
Sandra LaCelle for County Commissioner, Position 1
It was bad enough for Hansville citizens when the county's Democratic party leaders (I use the term loosely) decided to saddle us with Steve Bauer as an unelected commissioner to take the place of Chris Endresen. Endresen was responsible for the speed bumps that were installed in Hansville without broad community support and without meaningful notice and input from the community as a whole. Bauer, of course, was a pro-bumper and has been a key figure in the hostile takeover of Hansville by the GHAAC in 2007, when the County agreed to let a small, self-appointed group of people be the official "voice of all Hansville" (and Eglon, etc. as well) in all dealings with the County, and officially committed to helping that group achieve their "mandated GHA goals."
Bauer has proven to be completely unresponsive to people who do not agree with his pre-set agenda for Hansville (speed bumps included), and has revealed a remarkable lack of candor and openness when it comes to hard questions about his background, biases, and decision making processes regarding the speed bumps. While he is surely a golden boy appointee for the small group of people who are getting what they want from his new position, he has been a disaster for those who want to see transparency, accountability, and responsibility in County government, and for everyone in Hansville who thinks that they are quite capable of communicating with the County on their own and do not need the GHAAC to think and act for them.
As the deadline to file for candidacy in this fall's election approached, it looked bad for Hansville - nobody was filing to run against Bauer, and it appeared that he was going to get a free ride in the fall elections, Hansville being the Democratic Party country that it is. But shortly before the deadline, Sandra LaCelle, a Poulsbo attorney, filed to run against Bauer. She is running as a Republican.
Now, after two terms of Dubyah and his criminal enterprise, I had sworn I would never vote for a Republican candidate, no matter what the office. But one should never say never - and when given the choice between Steve Bauer and Sandra LaCelle, this is an easy call: VOTE LACELLE! My initial investigation of LaCelle and her approach to the commissioner's job has led me to conclude that a vote for her is a vote for someone who will bring the transparency, accountability, financial discipline, and responsiveness to all Hansville citizens that Bauer has failed to deliver. Yes, she is a Republican (and for those in Hansville who tend to vote GOP, that is fine), but I do not see the commissioner's job as being a particularly partisan seat. And it is hard for me to see how she could possibly be worse for Hansville than the divisive, polarizing, ultra-biased Steve Bauer. So, I will be just one of many Hansville Democrats voting for Sandra LaCelle.
For more information on Sandra LaCelle, check out both www.sandraclacelle.googlepages.com and www.lacellelaw.com.
Bauer has proven to be completely unresponsive to people who do not agree with his pre-set agenda for Hansville (speed bumps included), and has revealed a remarkable lack of candor and openness when it comes to hard questions about his background, biases, and decision making processes regarding the speed bumps. While he is surely a golden boy appointee for the small group of people who are getting what they want from his new position, he has been a disaster for those who want to see transparency, accountability, and responsibility in County government, and for everyone in Hansville who thinks that they are quite capable of communicating with the County on their own and do not need the GHAAC to think and act for them.
As the deadline to file for candidacy in this fall's election approached, it looked bad for Hansville - nobody was filing to run against Bauer, and it appeared that he was going to get a free ride in the fall elections, Hansville being the Democratic Party country that it is. But shortly before the deadline, Sandra LaCelle, a Poulsbo attorney, filed to run against Bauer. She is running as a Republican.
Now, after two terms of Dubyah and his criminal enterprise, I had sworn I would never vote for a Republican candidate, no matter what the office. But one should never say never - and when given the choice between Steve Bauer and Sandra LaCelle, this is an easy call: VOTE LACELLE! My initial investigation of LaCelle and her approach to the commissioner's job has led me to conclude that a vote for her is a vote for someone who will bring the transparency, accountability, financial discipline, and responsiveness to all Hansville citizens that Bauer has failed to deliver. Yes, she is a Republican (and for those in Hansville who tend to vote GOP, that is fine), but I do not see the commissioner's job as being a particularly partisan seat. And it is hard for me to see how she could possibly be worse for Hansville than the divisive, polarizing, ultra-biased Steve Bauer. So, I will be just one of many Hansville Democrats voting for Sandra LaCelle.
For more information on Sandra LaCelle, check out both www.sandraclacelle.googlepages.com and www.lacellelaw.com.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Why Such Unrest?
Over the past many months I have given a great deal of thought as to why Hansville has become so divided. The speed tables are the issue that have brought to light the GHAAC, it's structure and conduct, and eventually the Greater Hansville Sign controversy. I believe that most of the hardworking volunteers who make up the GHAAC truely do not grasp why there are people in the community who do not agree with what they are doing or how they conduct their business. The following analogy may shed some light for them.
Once upon a time a group of volunteers got together in a small town called Hansville. They worked together and came up with a preferred future for their community. They got input from about 15% of the population and drew up a plan based on that input and their own analysis. One of their concerns was that the community was served by only two roads and thousands of people had to use those small roads to access their homes. They worked to have these roads improved and widened so that the majority of the towns population could have easier access. They know that the people living along those two roads might not be very happy, but they did live on collector distributor roads, and their inconvenience was a small price to pay for the betterment of the overall community.
The group working to have the roads widened and improved did have to be careful about how much information they let out about their project as they worked up their proposal. They had to manage public perception of the issues and they also had to garner the support of county officials. This was easy to do - they had a close relationship with their current commissioner, who was planning to leave office and therefore could afford to help them out and not be around later to suffer the political fallout.
They group prevailed and the road was widened. The neighbors who lived along it were caught off guard and could not believe that a small group of their fellow citizens could plan their future, alter the infra-structure of their town, and lower their quality of life all in an effort to maintain the "livability" of Hansville. To them the town was now less livable. One member of the group was even appointed county commissioner to replace the one who quit. This appointment made it difficult for those opposed to the road widening.
So the town became divided. Neighbors were mad at neighbors and a lack of respect and understanding prevailed in the town. Citizens who were spoke out against the community volunteers were branded as dissenters and their efforts to make sure the town was managed in a democratic fashion were branded as trouble making. They were now called "Hansvillains".
Policies and decisions about the real Hansville need to take everyone into account. The GHAAC needs to make sure everyone has a chance to be heard, and that communication between the GHAAC and the citizens it represents is truly two-way. When the GHAAC makes decisions, especially if they impact peoples daily lives, they need to take everyone's needs into account. If not, the citizens of Hansville will continued to be divided and the number of "Hansvillains" will continue to grow.
Once upon a time a group of volunteers got together in a small town called Hansville. They worked together and came up with a preferred future for their community. They got input from about 15% of the population and drew up a plan based on that input and their own analysis. One of their concerns was that the community was served by only two roads and thousands of people had to use those small roads to access their homes. They worked to have these roads improved and widened so that the majority of the towns population could have easier access. They know that the people living along those two roads might not be very happy, but they did live on collector distributor roads, and their inconvenience was a small price to pay for the betterment of the overall community.
The group working to have the roads widened and improved did have to be careful about how much information they let out about their project as they worked up their proposal. They had to manage public perception of the issues and they also had to garner the support of county officials. This was easy to do - they had a close relationship with their current commissioner, who was planning to leave office and therefore could afford to help them out and not be around later to suffer the political fallout.
They group prevailed and the road was widened. The neighbors who lived along it were caught off guard and could not believe that a small group of their fellow citizens could plan their future, alter the infra-structure of their town, and lower their quality of life all in an effort to maintain the "livability" of Hansville. To them the town was now less livable. One member of the group was even appointed county commissioner to replace the one who quit. This appointment made it difficult for those opposed to the road widening.
So the town became divided. Neighbors were mad at neighbors and a lack of respect and understanding prevailed in the town. Citizens who were spoke out against the community volunteers were branded as dissenters and their efforts to make sure the town was managed in a democratic fashion were branded as trouble making. They were now called "Hansvillains".
Policies and decisions about the real Hansville need to take everyone into account. The GHAAC needs to make sure everyone has a chance to be heard, and that communication between the GHAAC and the citizens it represents is truly two-way. When the GHAAC makes decisions, especially if they impact peoples daily lives, they need to take everyone's needs into account. If not, the citizens of Hansville will continued to be divided and the number of "Hansvillains" will continue to grow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)